๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.5/5 from 894+ reviews
Pet โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller 

Reptile PVC Stone For Sleeping Basking

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.5 out of 5 (894 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$19​
$31.67
Sale
โœ“ at no charge delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

This item is in prefer latest condition Tub#66

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift fulfillment
โ†ฉ๏ธ
uncomplicated Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Reptile PVC Stone For Sleeping Basking

This item is in prefer brand-new condition

Tub#66​

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Pet products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 2002572

Category: Pet > Reptile Supplies > Terrerium Decor

Original Price:$31.67 USD

Sale Price: $19 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš distribution & Returns

โœ“ gratis fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.5
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 5909 reviews
WG
William Garcia โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Austin, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
remarkable investment
The Reptile PVC Stone For Sleeping Basking arrived exactly as shown.
42 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Baltimore, MD
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
superior
After a few use, the Reptile PVC Stone For Sleeping Basking works fine and it works for me.
45 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Oakland, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
remarkably pleased
The Reptile PVC Stone For Sleeping Basking feels solid in hand.
17 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Tampa, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
No complaints
So far, the Reptile PVC Stone For Sleeping Basking works fine so Iโ€™m okay with it.
45 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor โœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago ยท Aurora, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
premium
Personally, the Reptile PVC Stone For Sleeping Basking performs as expected and it works for me. Works fine so far.
38 people found this helpful